Reuben Abati, presidential spokesman, has criticised the endorsement of Muhammadu Buhari by The Economist of London, saying President Goodluck Jonathan is banking on patriotic Nigerians, and not foreign opinion writers, to re-elect him.
He condemned the newspaper’s “baseless, jaundiced and rather malicious vilification of President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan”.
The highly respected British weekly newspaper had, in an editorial, said it was endorsing the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), with a “heavy heart”, saying a former dictator is better than a failed president.
In his statement issued on Friday, Abati said: “We have noted with surprise, The Economist’s tongue-in-cheek endorsement of General Muhammadu Buhari in the run-up to Nigeria’s general elections and the international magazine’s baseless, jaundiced and rather malicious vilification of President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan who retains the trust and confidence of majority of Nigerians as the outcome of the Presidential elections will undoubtedly show.
Advertisement
“We are sure that many Nigerians and other readers of the usually urbane, thoughtful and well-reasoned editorial opinions of the Economist will be shocked that the magazine has taken the very ill-considered decision to throw its weight behind a candidate who, as a former military dictator, curtailed freedom of speech, ordered the kidnapping of opponents and jailing of journalists, and is accused of incitement to violence and grave human rights violations in Nigeria’s current democratic dispensation.
“The Economist may feign ignorance of President Jonathan’s remarkable achievements as leader of his country in the past six years, but Nigerians who, unlike the magazine’s opinion writers, will actually vote in the country’s forthcoming presidential elections, know that President Jonathan has worked very hard to fulfill all the major promises he made to them on assumption of office.
“Nigerians know that President Jonathan has developed our economy and created more jobs, they know that he has given policy support to the real sector of the economy, so that Small and Medium Enterprises can thrive, they know that he has encouraged locally owned enterprises to take advantage of our resources in growing the domestic economy and they also know that he has successfully attracted greater foreign direct investment to the country.
Advertisement
“Unlike the clearly poorly informed and distant authors of the Economist Opinion titled ‘The Least Awful’, appreciative Nigerians are also aware that President Jonathan has worked tirelessly to improve power supply across the nation, rebuild and expand national infrastructure, improve public transportation and provide greater access to quality education for all Nigerian youth.
“They know very well too that President Jonathan has significantly improved healthcare services in the country, revolutionized agriculture, promoted gender equality and women empowerment, and done his very best to stem corruption in government.
“Contrary to the Economist’s assertions, Nigeria, under President Jonathan has made very considerable progress.
“In spite of the significant challenges of terrorism and insurgency the nation faces today, President Jonathan has ensured that Nigeria has become a more vibrant democracy with free media, an independent judiciary, free, fair and credible elections, and greater respect for human rights.
Advertisement
“The Economist is entitled to its erroneous opinion on who represents the best leadership option for Nigeria in the coming elections, but happily for the country, it is not the magazine’s lead writers, but more knowledgeable and patriotic Nigerians who actually work and live in the country, that will vote and re-elect President Jonathan for a second term in office.
“They will do so, because unlike the Economist’s opinion writers, they understand that a Buhari Presidency will, for their beloved country, represent a stark setback and retrogression from the tremendous ongoing positive transformation of Nigeria under President Jonathan’s leadership.”
6 comments
The truth is that no independent people worth the description will chose their leader based on the opinion of foreigners who may not wish them well and may never have visited their country.
The truth will always be bitter. The economist’s analysis is right. Abati’s claims are all lies. I have not had power in my area for a long time. What kind of yeye transformation is he talking about. Enough is enough Mr. Abati
I started discounting the endorsement of The Economist magazine when, in 1996, they endorsed Bob Dole over Bill Clinton. Of course, Clinton won. To be sure, The Economist team is entitled even to a wrong choice.
Reuben Abati obliviously lives on a different Planet Aso where he is shielded from reality or is in a trance, having been hypnotized and is thus incapable of receiving input from the environment as to what the true opinion of the majority of Nigerians is about GEJ.
The correct heading for this Abati’s write up is ” Abati protecting his garri”. You better start looking for another job,
Abati is a lost son of Ogun, from where we both hail. He knows very well like the other sycophant, Okupe, also from Ogun, that Buhari will win our state. Jonathan’s campaign spokesman, the reprobate Fani-Kayode, will lose his Osun to Buhari just like he lost her to Aregbesola. The people’s general is set to win at least 20 and get 25% in at worst 28 out of the 36 states.