Advertisement

Abbas under fire over bill prescribing 10-year imprisonment for persons who refuse to recite anthem

Tajudeen Abbass, speaker of the house of representatives Tajudeen Abbass, speaker of the house of representatives
Tajudeen Abbas, speaker of the house of representatives

Tajudeen Abbas, speaker of the house of representatives, has received knocks over a bill seeking to punish citizens who refuse to recite the national anthem and pledge.

The proposed legislation, called the ‘Counter Subversion Bill’, is sponsored by the speaker. It was introduced on the floor of the green chamber in July.

According to the bill, Nigerians who refuse to recite the anthem would be liable to 10 years imprisonment, or fined N5 million, or both.

The bill also seeks to punish anyone who professes loyalty to an organisation that disregards the country’s sovereignty — with four years imprisonment or a fine of N3 million.

Advertisement

Nigeria recently reverted to its old anthem following an executive bill.

The proposed legislation has sparked outrage, with Oby Ezekwesili, a former minister, calling it “irrelevant”. She argued that there are more pressing issues confronting the country.

The bill has also been slammed on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, as a descent into “dictatorship” or “totalitarianism”.

Advertisement

‘BILL WITHIN REALM OF ANTI-TERRORISM NETWORK’

Reacting to the umbrage that has greeted the bill, Musa Krishi, spokesperson of the speaker, said the legislation falls within Nigeria’s anti-terrorism framework.

He said the bill seeks to address subversive activities by associations, organisations, militias, cults, bandits, and other proscribed groups.

“Similar legislation obtains in other climes with varied appellations. Such countries include the United Kingdom, Spain, India, Turkey, Canada, Australia, among others,” the spokesperson said.

“The speaker, and by extension the house of representatives, which is the people’s house, welcome robust engagements and discussions from Nigerians on the contents of the bill, and how best to address the concerns raised.

“By Parliamentary processes and procedures, the Bill would have to be listed for Second Reading, where Members will thoroughly scrutinize its merits and demerits during debate. At this stage, Members can decide to ‘kill’ or allow the Bill to pass.

“But if it scales to second reading, it would be referred to the relevant committee of the House for further legislative action.”

Kirishi said the bill was about national security and does not target any group.

Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected from copying.