APGA could not prove allegations of rigging in Abia, says S’court

Ikpeazu and Otti contested the election on the platforms of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) respectively.

Giving reasons for its February 3 judgment, Suleiman Galadima, a justice, held that Otti and the APC were unable to prove the issue of over voting, allegations of violence and corrupt practices allegedly perpetrated by the respondents.

“On the issue of over voting, the court holds that there was no sufficient proof as the voter register and the card reader report were not tendered,” he said.

“The criminal allegation of corrupt malpractices carried out by PDP loyalists for the benefit of the governor was not also proved.”

On the cancellation of the election results in Obingwa, Osisioma Ngwa and Isiala Ngwa by the returning officers, Galadima held that it was wrong.

“That action amounted to the disenfranchisement of voters. It was also inappropriate for the tribunal to order the cancellation of election,” he said.

“All of this misappropriation only gave room for the unlawful declaration of the APGA candidate by the lower court.

“Those actions were perversion of justice and the apex court could not have allowed them.”

Galadima further held that the evidence placed before the court showed clearly that the tribunal usurped the constitutional duties of INEC.

“On the card reader, the court maintains its earlier position that the tribunal cannot supplant the voter register,” he said.

“The gadget is only meant to authenticate bearers of voter card and not meant to usurp the statutory power of the voter register.

“At the moment, the voter register remains the only authentic document as provided by Section 49 of the electoral act to prove allegation of fraud in elections.”