Dale Carnegie says that most of the important things in the world have been accomplished by people who kept trying when there seemed to be no hope. The Nigerian agro-foods sector, once the backbone of the nation’s economy, is currently grappling with a series of challenges that have notably hampered its growth and ability to reach its full potential. These challenges, which include inadequate infrastructure, insecurity, and the adulteration of agricultural inputs, not only compromise the productivity and sustainability of the sector but also exacerbate the country’s growing food insecurity and shortage crisis.
Poor road networks, lack of storage facilities, and unreliable power supply hinder the efficient movement and processing of agricultural produce, leading to massive post-harvest losses. Meanwhile, insecurity, particularly in rural areas, has led to the abandonment of farmlands and the destruction of crops, making it increasingly difficult for farmers to maintain their livelihoods. Additionally, the widespread use of adulterated fertilisers, pesticides, and seeds undermines the effectiveness of farming practices, further reducing yields and harming the environment.
These multifaceted issues require urgent and coordinated intervention from the Nigerian government, private stakeholders, and international partners to ensure the long-term viability of the sector and address the food crisis facing the country. This paper looks into these pressing challenges and examines potential solutions to revitalise Nigeria’s agro-foods industry and ensure food security for its population.
1. Inadequate Infrastructure: A Major Bottleneck
Advertisement
A very critical challenge facing the Nigerian agro-foods sector is inadequate infrastructure, which directly impacts the efficiency of agricultural operations, food distribution, and overall productivity. The lack of reliable infrastructure, including poor road networks, insufficient storage facilities, and erratic power supply, notably hinders the sector’s growth and contributes to the nation’s food insecurity. These infrastructure gaps increase costs for farmers and leads to high post-harvest losses, reduced quality of produce, and lower profitability. They include:
a. Poor Road Networks and Transportation Challenges: A major infrastructural issue is Nigeria’s inadequate road networks, especially in rural and agricultural regions. Many roads are poorly maintained or completely inaccessible, making it difficult for farmers to transport their goods to local or urban markets. In some cases, farmers are forced to transport goods over long distances, often using outdated or makeshift vehicles, which increases the risk of spoilage and damages the produce. For instance, tomatoes, one of Nigeria’s most important cash crops, are highly perishable and sensitive to transport conditions. The journey from rural farms to urban markets, often on poorly maintained roads, can take hours or even days, leading to huge losses. In 2018, the Nigerian National Bureau of Statistics reported that about 40% of tomatoes grown in the country were lost due to inadequate storage and poor transportation infrastructure. This lack of access to efficient transport results in waste, as the produce rots before it can be sold, largely affecting farmers’ incomes and contributing to food shortages.
b. Insufficient Storage Facilities: Storage infrastructure is another significant bottleneck in the Nigerian agro-foods sector. Without proper facilities to store crops after harvest, farmers are forced to sell their produce immediately or risk losing it to spoilage. Perishable crops like tomatoes, yams, and onions, which are highly sensitive to temperature and humidity, particularly suffer from the absence of adequate storage systems. In a typical scenario, farmers harvest their crops and transport them to market in a rush, but without the necessary cold storage or proper warehousing, the produce degrades before it can reach consumers. In a 2020 study by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), it was estimated that over 50% of fruits and vegetables grown in Nigeria spoil due to the lack of cold storage. This not only results in food waste but also severely impacts farmers’ financial stability, as they are forced to sell their produce at lower prices or abandon it altogether.
Advertisement
c. Inconsistent Power Supply and its Impact on Agro-Processing: The lack of a stable power supply is another major issue in the Nigerian agro-foods sector, particularly in the processing of raw agricultural products. Nigeria’s electricity grid is unreliable, with frequent power outages and voltage fluctuations, which disrupt both small and large-scale agro-processing operations. For example, local mills that process grains like maize and rice are often affected by power cuts, leading to delays and decreased production capacity. Similarly, food processing industries that rely on refrigeration for perishable goods, such as dairy products or fruits, face bottlenecks due to inconsistent electricity supply. Without stable power, processing plants are unable to operate at full capacity, causing a reduction in the availability of value-added products in the market.
The absence of consistent electricity further deters the development of agro-processing industries in rural areas, where many agricultural activities are concentrated. As a result, raw agricultural products are often sold without being processed, which limits the value that farmers can extract from their crops. For example, cassava, a staple crop in Nigeria, could be processed into products like garri or starch, adding value and creating jobs. However, without reliable electricity to power processing machinery, many farmers are unable to tap into these opportunities.
d. Lack of Mechanisation: Another aspect of inadequate infrastructure in Nigeria’s agro-foods sector is the lack of mechanisation, which restricts farmers’ ability to increase productivity and scale up their operations. Farming in Nigeria is still predominantly labor-intensive, with many smallholder farmers relying on traditional tools and manual labor to plant, weed, and harvest crops. While small-scale farming is the backbone of the nation’s agriculture, it is also inefficient and often yields low productivity. For instance, the use of manual hoes and cutlasses in land preparation is time-consuming and not conducive to meeting the growing food demand in Nigeria. Mechanisation, which includes the use of tractors, harvesters, and irrigation systems, could notably increase crop yields and reduce the amount of time and labor required for farming. However, the high cost of machinery, limited access to credit facilities, and the lack of government subsidies for agricultural mechanisation prevent many farmers from adopting modern farming techniques. In a country where over 70% of farmers rely on subsistence farming, the absence of mechanisation means that most farmers struggle to increase their output and improve the quality of their produce. This not only limits their potential for profit but also stalls efforts to meet Nigeria’s increasing food demands.
2. Adulteration of Agricultural Inputs: A Growing Concern
Advertisement
Another alarming issue affecting Nigeria’s agro-foods sector is the widespread adulteration of agricultural inputs, including fertilisers, pesticides, and seeds. This problem has reached major proportions, with many farmers unknowingly purchasing substandard or fake inputs that severely undermine crop yields, degrade soil quality, and have lasting negative effects on the environment and public health. The effects of this adulteration are far-reaching, leading not only to financial losses for farmers but also to a broader food security crisis, as the country struggles to meet its agricultural needs.
a. Fake Fertilisers and Their Impact on Crop Yields: Fertilisers are essential for improving soil fertility and promoting healthy crop growth, yet a huge proportion of fertilisers in the Nigerian market are either adulterated or completely counterfeit. Many of these fake fertilisers are made with inferior or inappropriate materials that do not provide the necessary nutrients for plant growth. For instance, some fake fertilisers are found to contain dangerous chemicals or fillers that may provide an initial appearance of fertility but ultimately harm the soil and reduce crop yields over time. These substandard fertilisers often lack vital nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, leading to poor plant development, stunted growth, and lower-quality produce. The long-term consequences include the degradation of the soil, as these fake fertilisers fail to replenish essential soil nutrients, making it increasingly difficult for farmers to grow crops successfully without constant supplementation. In a 2021 survey conducted by the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC), it was reported that over 30% of the fertilisers sold in Nigeria were found to be adulterated. Farmers, who may not have the resources or knowledge to verify the authenticity of the products they purchase, are left at the mercy of dishonest suppliers who capitalise on the lack of regulatory enforcement. Can technology be harnessed for the easy verification?
b. Counterfeit Pesticides and Environmental Risks: The use of pesticides is another area where adulteration has become a major problem in Nigeria’s agro-foods sector. Pesticides play a vital role in controlling pests and diseases that could otherwise destroy crops. However, many farmers purchase counterfeit pesticides that contain harmful chemicals or insufficient active ingredients. Fake pesticides not only fail to control pests but also pose serious risks to the environment and public health. For example, counterfeit pesticides might contain toxic substances that can contaminate water sources, affect non-target species, or harm beneficial insects like pollinators. These pesticides can also lead to resistance in pests, making it harder to control infestations in the future.
Moreover, the indiscriminate use of these adulterated pesticides can have serious consequences for human health. In many cases, the fake pesticides leave harmful residues on crops, which may eventually make their way into the food supply. The consumption of such contaminated food can lead to chronic illnesses, including cancer and neurological disorders, affecting both consumers and farmers who apply the chemicals without proper safety precautions. This issue highlights the need for robust regulatory measures to ensure that pesticides are tested and certified before being sold to farmers – and that farmers can self verify for authenticity.
Advertisement
c. Fake Seeds and Poor Crop Germination: The adulteration of seeds is another critical concern that directly impacts the productivity and sustainability of the Nigerian agro-foods sector. Farmers often purchase fake or substandard seeds, which are often not genetically suited for the local environment. These seeds may have low germination rates, leading to poor crop establishment, reduced yields, and low-quality produce. For example, maize, one of Nigeria’s most widely grown crops, is often affected by counterfeit seeds that fail to germinate properly or produce subpar crops. This problem leads to financial losses for farmers and contributes to food insecurity, as the country depends on stable agricultural production to feed its growing population. Furthermore, fake seeds often fail to exhibit the traits of high-yielding or disease-resistant varieties that farmers expect. Instead, they often result in crops that are more susceptible to diseases and pests, leading to higher losses and the need for even more chemical inputs, which can be both financially burdensome and harmful to the environment – a good way out is to make use of only verified seed sources like East-West Seed (www.eastwestseed.com).
d. Weak Regulatory Oversight and Lack of Awareness: The prevalence of adulterated agricultural inputs in Nigeria’s agro-foods sector can be largely attributed to weak regulatory oversight and a lack of awareness among farmers. Regulatory agencies such as the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) and the Nigerian Agricultural Quarantine Service (NAQS) are responsible for monitoring and controlling the sale of agricultural inputs. However, due to limited resources, corruption, and lack of enforcement, these agencies often fail to effectively regulate the market, allowing fake and substandard products to flood the agricultural supply chain. Many farmers, particularly those in rural areas, are also unaware of the dangers posed by using counterfeit agricultural inputs. In some cases, they lack access to information on how to verify the authenticity of fertilisers, pesticides, and seeds, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation by unscrupulous traders. The absence of comprehensive farmer education programs on the risks of adulterated inputs only exacerbates this problem.
Advertisement
e. Economic and Environmental Consequences: The economic impact of adulterated agricultural inputs is profound. Farmers who unknowingly use fake products face crop failures and diminished yields, which leads to financial losses. These losses are particularly devastating for smallholder farmers, who rely on their agricultural produce to sustain their livelihoods and support their families. The financial strain also forces many farmers into a vicious cycle of poverty, making it harder for them to invest in quality inputs in subsequent seasons, thereby perpetuating the problem of low productivity. The environmental consequences of using adulterated agricultural inputs are equally concerning. Fake fertilisers and pesticides can degrade soil quality, reduce biodiversity, and pollute water sources, contributing to environmental degradation. The misuse of these products exacerbates the negative effects of climate change, making it even more challenging for farmers to produce food sustainably. Additionally, the contamination of food crops with harmful chemicals can have long-term public health impacts, further complicating Nigeria’s food security challenges.
3. Insecurity of Farmlands: A Looming Threat
Advertisement
In recent years, insecurity has emerged as one of the most significant threats to Nigeria’s agro-foods sector, exacerbating the challenges of food production and security. The rise in violent attacks by bandits, kidnappers, and insurgent groups, particularly in the northern and central parts of Nigeria, has severely disrupted agricultural activities. Farmers, who are the backbone of the nation’s food production, find themselves caught in an increasingly dangerous environment where the risk of violence, loss of life, and abduction forces many to abandon their farmlands. This situation not only impacts crop production but also devastates the livelihoods of millions of Nigerians who rely on agriculture as their primary source of income and sustenance.
a. Rising Insecurity and Its Impact on Farming Activities: Over the past decade, Nigeria has seen an alarming increase in violence targeting farming communities, particularly in the northern and central regions. The activities of armed bandits, terrorist groups such as Boko Haram, and other criminal elements have escalated to the point where farming has become a perilous endeavour. In states like Kaduna, Zamfara, Katsina, and Sokoto, armed groups regularly raid rural villages, steal livestock, destroy crops, and terrorise farmers. These groups often target vulnerable rural areas, making it difficult for farmers to continue their agricultural activities. For instance, in 2020 alone, the Nigerian Army reported that hundreds of farmers in these northern states were killed, kidnapped, or displaced due to insurgent attacks and banditry.
Advertisement
One particularly tragic case occurred in the community of Zabarmari, in Borno State, where over 40 farmers were killed in November 2020 by suspected Boko Haram militants while working in their rice fields. This attack sent shockwaves through the farming community and highlighted the extreme dangers that agricultural workers face in certain regions of Nigeria. Many farmers who were once able to cultivate their land have now been forced to flee, leaving behind crops and livestock they can no longer tend to.
Similarly, in Zamfara State, bandits have become notorious for attacking farming communities, stealing livestock, and extorting money from farmers. In 2021, reports indicated that thousands of farmers were unable to harvest their crops due to the ongoing violence, leading to an unprecedented food shortage in the region. In fact, the fear of attacks during harvest periods has made many farmers abandon their fields altogether, contributing to a decrease in food production.
b. Destruction of Crops and Loss of Livestock: The insecurity on farmlands has resulted in the large-scale destruction of crops, loss of livestock, and the displacement of farming families. Crops that would have been harvested are often set on fire by armed assailants or destroyed during raids. This results in a direct loss of food while having a long-term effect on the agricultural cycle, as farmers are often unable to plant in the following season due to the trauma or destruction caused by these attacks (can technology help secure these farms from attack?). Livestock, which are a major part of rural livelihoods, are often stolen or killed by criminal groups. This deprives farmers of their primary sources of income and affects local markets that depend on livestock for trade. The depletion of livestock resources has led to higher prices for meat and dairy products, contributing to inflation in food prices.
For example, in the Benue Valley, which is known as the “food basket” of Nigeria due to its rich agricultural productivity, farmers have lost thousands of cattle and sheep to raiders. In addition, vast swathes of farmland have been taken over by criminal groups or abandoned out of fear, leading to reduced food production. The combined effect of these losses is a severe decline in agricultural output, which impacts not only the local economy but also the broader national food supply.
c. Abandonment of Farmlands and Shift to Urban Areas: The increasing insecurity has pushed many farmers to abandon their traditional agricultural practices and migrate to urban areas in search of safety. In regions heavily affected by banditry and insurgency, rural-to-urban migration has accelerated as people seek refuge in cities, leaving their farms behind. This migration is particularly concerning as it exacerbates food insecurity, especially in a country like Nigeria, where rural areas contribute significantly to the nation’s agricultural output.
Farmers who previously relied on subsistence farming are now unable to make a living, leading to a depletion of local food supplies and a shortage of agricultural products in both urban and rural markets. This has created a significant gap in food production, as urban populations increasingly rely on imports or products from areas less affected by insecurity. The exodus of farmers from rural areas has also led to the collapse of local economies, as agriculture is the primary source of employment in many communities.
In addition to the physical destruction of farms, the psychological toll of insecurity has had lasting effects on agricultural practices. Farmers who have experienced trauma, witnessed violence, or lost loved ones are less likely to return to farming, even after the security situation improves. The loss of agricultural knowledge and experience in these communities only compounds the food security crisis.
d. Government Response and Policy Shortcomings: Despite the escalating insecurity, the response from the Nigerian government has often been slow and insufficient. While the government has deployed military forces to combat insurgent and bandit activities in some regions, the security situation remains dire, and many farmers continue to face immense risks. The inability of the state to provide adequate protection for farmers and their property has led to widespread frustration among the rural population.
Moreover, the government’s failure to implement a comprehensive national security strategy that specifically addresses the needs of the agricultural sector has left many farmers vulnerable. The absence of dedicated agricultural security forces or policies to assist farmers in conflict-prone areas has left the rural population feeling abandoned. While the government has occasionally provided relief aid to displaced farmers, these efforts have been sporadic and insufficient to address the long-term consequences of farmland insecurity.
B. Long-Term Consequences on Food Production and National Food Security
The insecurity surrounding farmlands is contributing to a vicious cycle of reduced food production, increased food prices, and heightened food insecurity. As more farmers abandon their land or face violence while working, Nigeria’s ability to produce enough food to feed its growing population becomes increasingly difficult. The United Nations estimates that over 12 million people in Nigeria are currently food insecure, and this number continues to rise as insecurity in farming regions worsens. The impact is most evident in the northern regions, where staple crops such as millet, sorghum, and maize are grown in large quantities. Insecurity has led to significant reductions in the production of these crops, which are crucial to both local consumption and export. As Nigeria is heavily reliant on these crops for food security, the disruption of production is having a ripple effect on the overall economy, leading to higher food prices, inflation, and a deepening poverty crisis.
1. Policy Inconsistency and Lack of Support: A major barrier to the development of Nigeria’s agro-foods sector is the persistent issue of policy inconsistency and a lack of robust support systems for farmers. Over the years, successive Nigerian governments have introduced various policies aimed at addressing food insecurity, boosting agricultural production, and improving the livelihoods of farmers. However, these policies have often been poorly implemented or have lacked continuity, undermining their potential impact. The absence of a coherent, long-term agricultural policy has left the sector vulnerable to a lack of direction, leading to inefficiencies and missed opportunities for growth.
2. Inconsistent Agricultural Policies and Poor Implementation: Despite several attempts by the Nigerian government to stimulate agricultural development, policy inconsistency has undermined progress. For example, one of the government’s key initiatives was the Agricultural Transformation Agenda (ATA) introduced by former President Goodluck Jonathan in 2011, which aimed to boost agricultural productivity through various measures, including the distribution of fertilisers, improved seeds, and the creation of an agricultural credit scheme. However, despite huge investments in the program, there were numerous instances of mismanagement and corruption. Fertiliser distribution, which was a cornerstone of the ATA, faced delays and inefficiencies, leading to widespread complaints from farmers who struggled to access the subsidised inputs.
Additionally, the government’s flagship agricultural policies have often lacked continuity due to frequent changes in leadership and shifting political priorities. For instance, the National Agricultural Policy, which was meant to provide a strategic framework for long-term agricultural development, has not been consistently updated or enforced. As a result, many of the initiatives introduced under previous administrations were either abandoned or altered in ways that limited their effectiveness. This lack of policy continuity has prevented the agricultural sector from achieving sustainable growth, leaving farmers unsure of the government’s commitment to supporting the sector.
3. Agricultural Subsidies: Poorly Executed Programs: Agricultural subsidies, which have long been touted as a solution to Nigeria’s food security challenges, have also suffered from poor execution and lack of accountability. The government has frequently introduced subsidy programs aimed at making inputs like fertilizers, pesticides, and seeds more affordable for farmers, thereby encouraging increased agricultural productivity. However, these programs have often been riddled with inefficiencies, corruption, and mismanagement, leading to little or no improvement in productivity.
For example, the Fertiliser Subsidy Scheme, which was intended to make fertilisers more accessible to smallholder farmers, has been plagued by allegations of fraud. Reports have highlighted instances where subsidised fertilisers were diverted to the black market or sold at inflated prices, making them inaccessible to the farmers who needed them the most. In 2017, a government audit revealed that over 60% of fertilisers intended for distribution in northern Nigeria were diverted, with only a fraction of the intended beneficiaries receiving the subsidised product. Such mismanagement has not only wasted public funds but also left farmers without the support they need to enhance their productivity.
Similarly, in 2016, the government introduced the Anchor Borrowers’ Programme (ABP), designed to provide affordable credit to smallholder farmers to enable them to purchase quality inputs and increase production. While the program initially garnered attention for its potential, it too faced issues of inefficiency and poor targeting. In many cases, funds were not reaching the intended beneficiaries, and bureaucratic delays in the approval of loans hindered the program’s success. The poor execution of such policies has ultimately contributed to the stagnation of Nigeria’s agricultural sector.
4. Limited Access to Credit and Financial Support: Access to affordable credit is another critical issue that hampers the growth of Nigeria’s agro-foods sector. Many farmers, especially smallholders, struggle to access financing for the purchase of quality inputs, mechanisation, and expansion of their farms. In a country where over 70% of farmers are subsistence farmers, limited access to affordable credit has created a cycle of low productivity and poverty.
Commercial banks are often reluctant to provide loans to farmers due to the perceived high risks involved in agriculture, such as fluctuating crop prices, inadequate infrastructure, and vulnerability to climate change. Furthermore, the high-interest rates charged by banks make borrowing unaffordable for most farmers, leaving them with few options for financing their operations. While the government has introduced initiatives such as the Nigerian Incentive-Based Risk Sharing System for Agricultural Lending (NIRSAL) and the ABP to address these challenges, access to affordable credit remains a persistent problem.
A relevant case is that of the Central Bank of Nigeria’s Anchor Borrowers’ Programme, which aimed to provide credit to smallholder farmers in various states. While the program has reached some farmers, many still report difficulty in accessing loans, and some of the loans that are issued are often not used for their intended purposes. For example, farmers in states like Kebbi and Zamfara have complained of the long delays in disbursement of funds, and even when the loans are received, they are often insufficient to cover the cost of needed inputs, such as quality seeds or mechanised tools.
5. Lack of Access to Training, Technology, and Modern Farming Practices: The absence of widespread training programs and the limited availability of modern agricultural technologies have also contributed to the stagnation of the agro-foods sector. Many farmers continue to rely on outdated farming methods, which result in low yields and poor-quality produce. While some farmers may be aware of modern farming practices, the lack of access to training, extension services, and technological tools prevents them from adopting these methods at scale.
For example, in states like Kogi, Nasarawa, and Plateau, farmers still primarily use manual labor and traditional tools such as hoes and cutlasses for planting and harvesting. The lack of mechanisation makes farming labor-intensive, inefficient, and less profitable. Without access to modern machinery like tractors, harvesters, and irrigation systems, it is difficult for farmers to increase their production capacity and improve their competitiveness. The limited access to technology and mechanised farming methods also means that farmers are unable to respond effectively to challenges such as climate change, pests, or diseases, further reducing their productivity.
Furthermore, while the government has attempted to improve agricultural education, the reach of extension services remains insufficient. In rural areas, where most of the farming population resides, extension officers who can provide training on modern agricultural techniques are often in short supply. The lack of agricultural training means that many farmers are unaware of best practices for pest management, soil fertility maintenance, and crop rotation, which are essential for long-term sustainable farming.
C. The Way Forward: Solutions to Nigeria’s Food Crisis
Nigeria’s food crisis is rooted in a combination of systemic issues, ranging from inadequate infrastructure to insecurity, and the pervasive problem of input adulteration. Tackling these challenges requires a holistic approach that takes into account both the immediate needs of the agricultural sector and the long-term sustainability of food production. Several strategies, drawn from successful approaches in other nations, could help Nigeria navigate its agricultural and food security crisis.
1. Strengthening Infrastructure: The Cornerstone of Agricultural Development
A major challenge Nigeria faces is inadequate infrastructure, particularly in rural areas. Poor road networks, lack of storage facilities, and unreliable electricity supply contribute to high post-harvest losses and hinder the effective processing of agricultural products. The development of rural infrastructure is essential to ensure that farmers can get their produce to market in good condition, minimise losses, and improve productivity.
Example from Kenya: Kenya, through its “Kenya Vision 2030” initiative, has notably improved its rural infrastructure, particularly roads and storage facilities, to aid farmers in accessing markets and reduce post-harvest losses. Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have been critical in this regard. For instance, the government and private entities have collaborated on building cold storage chains and transportation systems to ensure that perishable goods like vegetables and dairy reach urban markets in a timely manner. A similar strategy in Nigeria, where both the government and private stakeholders pool resources for rural infrastructure, could drive down transport costs, reduce spoilage, and encourage more farmers to participate in the market economy.
Additionally, electricity supply improvements are crucial for the processing of agricultural products. In countries like Thailand, where the agricultural sector is highly developed, consistent power supply ensures that processing plants can operate smoothly, adding value to raw products before they reach consumers. In Nigeria, improving electricity supply in rural areas would enable the establishment of processing plants that can add value to products like cassava, maize, and rice, boosting farmers’ income and reducing reliance on raw exports.
2. Tackling Input Adulteration: Ensuring Quality and Fairness
The adulteration of agricultural inputs such as fertilizers, pesticides, and seeds is a significant problem in Nigeria, leading to poor crop yields, environmental degradation, and financial losses for farmers. Combating this issue requires a multi-pronged approach involving stricter enforcement of regulations, public awareness campaigns, and greater transparency in the input supply chain.
Example from India: In India, the government has taken active steps to tackle the adulteration of agricultural inputs. One notable initiative is the “National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture,” which not only focuses on providing farmers with quality inputs but also strengthens regulatory oversight. In partnership with private companies, India has set up input quality assurance systems and traceability mechanisms that allow farmers to verify the authenticity of products before purchasing through technology. Nigeria can implement a similar regulatory framework by enhancing the capacity of agencies such as the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) and the Federal Ministry of Agriculture to monitor the input supply chain. Additionally, extending training and awareness programs to farmers on how to identify and avoid fake inputs will help empower them to make more informed purchasing decisions.
3. Addressing Insecurity on Farmlands: Protecting the Foundation of Food Production
Insecurity in Nigeria’s rural areas, particularly in the northern and middle-belt regions, is one of the leading factors exacerbating food insecurity. Farmers face frequent attacks by bandits, kidnappers, and insurgents, which forces them to abandon their land, resulting in crop destruction and a sharp decline in food production. Securing farmlands is paramount to restoring confidence in the agricultural sector and enabling farmers to go about their work safely.
Example from Colombia: Colombia, a country once ravaged by guerrilla warfare and drug-related violence, offers a model for addressing insecurity in rural areas. Through the creation of special security units focused on agricultural zones, the Colombian government worked with local communities to establish peace and security, allowing farmers to return to their lands. These units not only provided security but also built trust with rural populations, which significantly improved agricultural output. Nigeria could draw from this experience by creating specialised agricultural security forces and enhancing intelligence-sharing efforts (through technology platforms) between the government, law enforcement, and local communities. Additionally, encouraging community-based solutions, such as local vigilance committees, could provide farmers with immediate protection while also fostering a sense of ownership over their security.
4. Promoting Policy Consistency and Support for Farmers: A Comprehensive Approach
For long-term success in addressing Nigeria’s food crisis, the government must prioritise the development of clear, consistent, and supportive agricultural policies. The absence of coherent policies has hindered agricultural growth, as policy shifts, lack of implementation, and corruption have often undermined the impact of well-intentioned initiatives.
Example from Brazil: Brazil has made major strides in agricultural development, particularly in the areas of policy consistency and government support. Brazil’s “Plano Safra,” a yearly agricultural policy framework, provides long-term vision and stability for the agricultural sector. It includes provisions for subsidies, affordable credit, technical assistance, and insurance for farmers. This comprehensive approach has helped transform Brazil into one of the world’s largest exporters of agricultural products. Nigeria could adopt a similar policy approach, ensuring that agricultural policies remain consistent across administrations and are backed by strong implementation mechanisms. Farmers should have reliable access to affordable credit, subsidies, training programs, and insurance, especially given the vulnerability of the sector to climate change and other external shocks.
5. Encouraging Technology and Innovation: Modernising Agriculture
The adoption of technology and innovation is crucial to improving Nigeria’s agricultural productivity. Technologies such as mechanisation, precision farming, and digital platforms for market access can help Nigerian farmers address challenges such as low productivity, climate change, and market inefficiencies.
Example from China: China’s agricultural sector has undergone huge modernisation in recent decades, driven by the adoption of advanced farming technologies. The Chinese government has invested heavily in agricultural research and development, promoting the use of precision farming tools, drones for monitoring crop health, and AI-powered tools for efficient irrigation management. These technologies have helped increase yields and reduce environmental impact. Nigeria can benefit from similar investments in technology, especially in promoting the use of drones, digital platforms for market access, and precision farming tools. Public-private partnerships in research and development can foster the growth of innovations tailored to Nigeria’s unique agricultural challenges.
6. Promoting Sustainable Farming Practices: Ensuring Environmental and Food Security
Sustainability is key to ensuring the long-term viability of Nigeria’s agricultural sector. A shift towards sustainable farming practices that focus on soil preservation, water management, and crop diversification can help improve food production while protecting the environment.
Example from Ethiopia: Ethiopia has made strides in promoting sustainable farming practices through its “Climate Resilient Green Economy” strategy. The government has supported farmers with training on agro-ecology, which emphasises biodiversity, soil conservation, and water management techniques. This approach has not only helped improve agricultural productivity but also mitigated the impacts of climate change. Nigeria can implement similar sustainable agricultural practices, providing farmers with access to training on climate-smart agriculture and incentivising them to adopt eco-friendly farming techniques. Long-term investments in irrigation systems, reforestation, and conservation programs can help improve soil fertility, water management, and overall resilience to climate change.
Conclusion
The Nigerian agro-foods sector is grappling with a range of interconnected challenges, including insecurity, inadequate infrastructure, the adulteration of agricultural inputs, and policy inconsistencies, all of which hinder its potential to achieve sustainable food security. However, with targeted investments, comprehensive policy reforms, and a renewed commitment to addressing these systemic issues, Nigeria has the opportunity to overcome its current food security crisis. Strategic initiatives aimed at improving infrastructure, securing farmlands, combating input fraud, and promoting agricultural innovation can measurably better productivity and resilience in the sector. By implementing these solutions, Nigeria has the potential to boost its agricultural output while creating a sustainable food system that supports the livelihoods of millions and provides a strong foundation for long-term economic growth. The path forward requires a collaborative effort from the government, private sector, and local communities to ensure the country’s agricultural future is both prosperous and secure.
Thank you for the huge investment in time and attention. Please follow my Medium: https://medium.com/@roariyo (for more of my curated thoughts) and LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/olufemiariyo/ or send an email to techtalk@freesia.com.ng
