The National Conference Standing Committee on Politics and Governance on Tuesday, unanimously resolved to expunge Section 308 of the 1999 Constitution, which deals with immunity clause.
Arguments were canvassed for either partial or total removal of the clause, with few members supporting the retention of the clause.
However, after heated debate, all members of the committee, including Mike Ahamba (SAN) and Haliru Mohammed who earlier rejected the removal, changed their positions.
Speaking after the unanimous resolution, Co-Chairmen, Chief Olu Falae and Prof Jerry Gana said that the decision was to send a strong signal that Nigeria would no longer condone official corruption.
Advertisement
Falae said: “We are all humiliated by the level of corruption in Nigeria exemplified with the competitive thievery that is going on in the polity.
“So we need to send a powerful and clear signal to Nigerians and to the whole world that Nigeria is determined to make a break from official corruption.
“And by expunging section 308 from the constitution and publicising that action, Nigerians will see that we are serious people, we mean business and we want Nigeria to be clean.
Advertisement
Heartless
“The danger of corruption is not only that it is morally wrong but it also denies billions of dollars to good projects that could create jobs and provide health facilities and education for our children.
“These (corrupt officials) are heartless people sentencing people to penury by stealing the commonwealth.
“This committee has decided by consensus to recommend to the main conference plenary that Section 308 of the constitution to be removed.
Advertisement
“In the new order, the President, Vice-President, Governor and Deputy-Governor will no longer enjoy immunity against and in respect of both criminal and civil liability.”
In his remarks, Gana commended the consensus spirit of the committee and the strength of arguments, which convinced Ahamba and Mohammed to change their positions.
“One feels very impressed by the sound arguments on this matter even by those who had reasons to say there should be protection.
“So, one can see transparency and determination to deal with a very serious problem and one is persuaded by the force of argument.
Advertisement
“The logic is very sound and almost irresistible.
“We should send a very clear and firm message to the Nigerian nation to expunge the whole of that section.
Advertisement
“I pray that this conference will not fail in that task.”
Frivolous Court Injunctions
Advertisement
He, however, said that there was the need for the committee to propose something that will serve as a check to forestall unnecessary court injunctions.
“The problem of Nigeria about court injunction can be very serious. Court injunctions can paralyse governance.”
Advertisement
NAN reports that the committee later agreed to come up with a position on ways to check frivolous court injunctions that are capable of paralysing governance.
4 comments
Nice move. Hoping that it wil scale through. The level of primitive accumulation in my dear nation is alarming. More power to ur elbow
I hope the plenary will never approve the thoughtless and seer emotional argument relating to expulsion of section 308 of 1999 constitution dealing with immunity against criminal prosecution against certain class of political executives. Given the brutal elites rivalries and struggle for political power in Nigeria, it's quite difficult to see how the president and governor can concentrate in the act of governance if the immunity clause is removed. We should all stop this clownish entertaiment for its explosively dangerous to the political health of the nation. Can you imagine the number of cases that will flood our courts if protective immunity is removed? Beyond that, the whole idea of a president of the nation being subpoenaed to court and examine, cross examined and re-examined will completely destroy the festerin unity of our nation and create unnecessary ethno-religious tension.
Beyond that, if the prosecutorial power still resides with the AG and Minister of Justice, how realistic is it for such office holder, an appointee of the President/Governor to prosecute his principals? Even now that some of the hitherto governors/presidents that presided over the affairs of the country between 1999-2011 no longer enjoy immunity, how many of them have been successfully prosecuted, convicted and sentenced within the dynamics of our criminal statutes?
If we are not all engage in comedic show, impeachment is a resourceful instrument for the recalcitrant political executives who offend the law and abuse his exalted high office. If we however intend to make more money for the wole olanipekuns, Agbakobas,Kasunmus, Eliases,Osibajos, Yusuf Alis, etal, the immunity can be removed. Did the committee evaluate the volume of money that will heamorage the treasury as a result of the legal contest and the capacity of the president/Governor to assemble leading legal minds for their defenses? If the protagonists of the of immunity expects Nigerians to applauds them, I think they need to have a rethink, they have just dulls my mood. Do they intend to remove also the prerogative of mercy which the president/governor enjoys and can be used to pardon any citizen convicted of crime?
Well analysed… keep the comments coming.
May God bring forth his assistance to this country. Sometimes when I try to analyse the country's many problems, there seems to be no way out. Things have gone really bad.