--Advertisement--

COVID-19: WHO resumes chloroquine trial

The World Health Organization says it is resuming hydrochloroquine trial for treatment of COVID-19 patients.

On May 22, a study published by The Lancet, a medical journal, claimed that chloroquine had no positive effect on the treatment of COVID-19 among 96,032 sampled patients.

Three days later, Tedros Ghebreyesus, the WHO director-general, announced a “temporary pause” in the WHO solidarity trial of the drug, while citing the study.

Addressing a virtual press conference on Wednesday, Tedros said the drug trial will now commence in the quest of finding a solution to the virus.

Advertisement

He said findings by the WHO data safety monitoring board revealed that there was no reason to discontinue the trial after reviewing available data on the drug.

Tedros said the executive group endorsed the recommendation, adding that “all arms of the solidarity trial” will continue.

“Last week, the executive group of the Solidarity Trial decided to implement a temporary pause of the hydroxychloroquine arm of the trial, because of concerns raised about the safety of the drug,” he said.

Advertisement

“This decision was taken as a precaution while the safety data were reviewed. The data safety and monitoring committee of the solidarity trial has been reviewing the data.

“On the basis of the available mortality data, the members of the committee recommended that there are no reasons to modify the trial protocol.

“The executive group received this recommendation and endorsed continuation of all arms of the solidarity trial, including hydroxychloroquine. The executive group will communicate with the principal investigators in the trial about resuming the hydroxychloroquine arm of the trial.

“The data safety and monitoring committee will continue to closely monitor the safety of all therapeutics being tested in the solidarity trial.”

Advertisement

This development is coming few hours after an investigation revealed that the suspension of hydroxychloroquine trial by WHO was based on questionable data.

Advertisement

Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected from copying.