--Advertisement--
Advertisement

‘Increase oversight, control money supply’ — Agora Policy advises CBN on taming inflation

World Bank: Number of poor Nigerians increased by 24m between 2018 and 2023 World Bank: Number of poor Nigerians increased by 24m between 2018 and 2023

Agora Policy, an Abuja-based think tank, has highlighted ways the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) can tame the country’s rising inflation. 

The think tank — founded by Waziri Adio, former executive secretary of the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) — made the recommendations in its latest report on Monday. 

The consumer price index (CPI), which measures the rate of change in prices of goods and services, rose to 22.41 percent in May, up from 22.22 percent in the previous month.

According to the report, the starting point for the CBN is to recognise the scale of the inflation challenge and the importance of getting the situation under control.

Advertisement

“As long as inflation remains high, every other objective, be it the quest for exchange rate stability or the president’s agenda for increased cheap lending to MSMEs, will be much more difficult to achieve. The CBN needs to remember that its primary monetary policy objective is to keep inflation in check,” the report reads. 

“Given that inflation is currently much higher than ideal, the direction of monetary policy has to be to tighten or reduce the growth of money supply. This also means that interest rates will likely have to go up. How far up? At least to the point where “real” interest rates are no longer negative, but maybe even higher.

“These actions to reduce the growth of money supply and increase interest rates are likely to be complicated by all the underhand administrative measures which were put in place to force rates down or to limit money supply growth through the back door.”

Advertisement

The report added that the many administrative measures have proved that the monetary policy rate has recently no longer influenced interest rates either for government securities or at the banks, “making the monetary policy committee effectively meaningless”. 

“The unwinding of the ad-hoc cash reserve ratio (CRR) policy, which means money refunded to banks, will also have unintended effects if not managed. The CBN will need to unwind most of these ad-hoc measures,” the think tank said. 

“Given the misdirection by the CBN over the last few years, there may be a tendency for the government to want to take closer control of monetary policy.

“This will likely be counterproductive as it has been demonstrated here in Nigeria and in other countries where governments tend to want to use monetary policy for other non-inflation objectives. Which is the underlying problem that the CBN faces today.”

Advertisement

‘STRENGTHEN MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE, INCREASE OVERSIGHT’

According to the report, a better way forward would be to strengthen the monetary policy committee and place limits on CBN’s actions that fall beyond the scope of its regular actions. 

“One option here would be to increase the number of independent members of the committee (currently only four out of 12) and/or reduce the members from the CBN and other government agencies,” the report recommends. 

“For instance, there is no real reason why the deputy governor for corporate services, a largely administrative role, should be voting on monetary policy.

Advertisement

“Increased oversight, to ensure that the CBN actually implements the decisions of the monetary policy committee, would also help strengthen the credibility of the CBN.”

‘STOP FINANCING WAYS AND MEANS’

Advertisement

The direct sources of expansion in money supply witnessed over the past decade, specifically the ways and means the financing of the government and the myriad of intervention funds will have to stop, the think tank warned. 

“Else, it would be equivalent to removing the plug to drain liquidity from the bathtub while at the same time turning on the taps,” Agora Policy said

Advertisement

“As demonstrated above, not everything is within the purview of central banks. For instance, supply shocks, which are beyond the remit of central banks, are also known to drive up inflation.

“This in essence means that other actors, such as the governments at both the federal and state levels, can take actions to influence supply positively, which should put downward pressure on prices and therefore reduce inflation.”

Advertisement

 

Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected from copying.