Malabu oil deal: I could only have been bribed If I had a time machine, says Jonathan

Goodluck Jonathan, former president, has rubbished the report which suggested that he received $200 million kickbacks from the Malabu oil deal.

Buzzfeed, an American news website, had reported that Jonathan benefitted from the sale of the controversial OPL 245 oil block.

Reacting to the report, Jonathan said the Malabu oil deal was struck before his administration, noting that Buzzfeed’s report can only hold water if he had a time machine.

In a statement released on Tuesday by Ikechukwu Eze, his media adviser, the ex-president said the “fake news” was sponsored by those hellbent on truncating his rising international profile.

“The allegations that former President Goodluck Jonathan received $200 million as proceeds from the Malabu Oil deal which were published on a gossip news site, Buzzfeed, and republished by a few other newspapers, is false in its entirety, and is one more in the series of fake news sponsored by those threatened by Dr. Jonathan’s continuously rising profile in the international community,” he said.

“Common sense should have shown the purveyors of this slander that the Malabu oil deal far predated the Jonathan regime and it would only make sense for him to be bribed if he had a time machine to go back in time to when the deal was struck.

“The report relied on hearsay evidence from a man of questionable character who provided no substance to back up his false claim.

“The man quoted by the report said he ‘assumed’ that Dr. Jonathan would be bribed. Since when has the assumption of a crook been enough to smear the reputation of a patriot and international statesman like Dr. Goodluck Jonathan?

Jonathan also denied tutoring the children of Dan Etete, former petroleum minister, as stated in the report.

He said the claim is “clearly ridiculous” as he has never met Etete’s children.

“The report also wrongly claimed that “Jonathan and Etete had known each other for years, according to Shell staff, when Jonathan served
as a tutor to Etete’s children while he was a minister”. This claim is clearly ridiculous and nothing can be further from the truth.

“In the first place, the former President couldn’t have been a ‘tutor’ to Etete’s children without first establishing contact with the family.

“This is because Jonathan met Etete who served as the Petroleum Minister in Gen. Abacha’s military regime for the first time under the
succeeding civilian administration, when he was already the deputy Governor of Bayelsa State. Even then, the fact remains that ex-President Jonathan has never met any of Etete’s children.

“Besides, Jonathan couldn’t have been anybody’s private tutor during that period, because he was already in the directorate cadre in Oil
Mineral Producing Areas Development Commission, OMPADEC (now NDDC), having already left the academia, at the time Etete was a serving minister.”

The ex-president noted that the series of fake reports being published about him were geared at achieving a yet-to-be-revealed purpose.

Jonathan said he did not and does not own any bank account, aircraft or real estate outside Nigeria.

“This story, coming so soon after the fake news that Dr. Goodluck Jonathan refused British help in rescuing the Chibok Girls (a story
that the British Government debunked) and that he plans to contest the 2019 elections (another lie), proves that these fallacious stories are deliberately contrived for reasons that are yet to be publicly disclosed,” he said.

“It is instructive that this same old fable apparently intended to rubbish Jonathan’s name locally and internationally, is being recycled with more lies added to garnish the narrative, at a time the ex-President is making efforts to resolve the issues in the People’s Democratic Party (PDP).

“Again, let us point out for clarity and for the umpteenth time that while he was in office and now that he is out of office, former
President Jonathan did not open and does not own any bank account, aircraft or real estate outside Nigeria.

“Anyone with contrary information is challenged to publicly publish same.

“Finally, Dr. Jonathan appeals to the media to report facts rather than innuendo and gossip. He asks that the media ought to remember that he signed the Freedom of Information Act into law and it is only fair to use it to investigate allegations and establish the truth.

“Dr. Jonathan cannot stop criminals from ‘assuming’, but he can and he will stop them from getting away with blatant lies.”