--Advertisement--

Ondo Redemption sues house of assembly, seeks panel for Akeredolu’s health assessment

The Ondo Redemption Front(ORF), a sociopolitical group, has filed a lawsuit against the Ondo State House of Assembly over the controversies generated by the continued absence of Rotimi Akeredolu, governor of Ondo, from the state.

In the suit filed before a high court in Akure, the state capital, the group sought an order to compel the assembly to constitute a medical panel for the assessment of Akeredolu’s health, pursuant to Section 189(4) of the 1999 constitution.

The lawsuit comes amid growing concerns and speculation about Akeredolu’s health, which have raised questions about his ability to continue performing his duties as the state’s chief executive.

Section 189 of the Nigerian Constitution grants the state assembly the authority to initiate a medical panel to assess the health of a state governor when there are doubts or concerns about their ability to perform their duties.

Advertisement

The suit with Motion number AK/30M/2023 filed on behalf of the group by some if its leaders, which includes Ologun Ayodeji, Olufemi Lawson, Isijola Kike and Arogbo Olaniyi, through their lawyer, Mogbojuri Kayode Esq, is seeking an order of the court, to grant leave to the applicants, to apply for an order of mandamus compelling the assembly to carry out their statutory and constitutional duty on Akeredolu as stipulated by the constitution.

The applicants in their affidavit deposed to by the 5th respondent stated that they have disclosed sufficient reasons for for the order of the court to be made to compel the Speaker ODHA to appoint medical panel to investigate the health of Akeredolu and making such order will not prejudice the interest of anyone rather, it will safeguard the Nigerian constitution.

“This is not a political move, but rather a call for transparency and accountability in the governance of our dear state.”

Advertisement

The speaker, Akeredolu and attorney-general have been named as the defendants in the case, and the court is expected to consider the matter and make a determination in due course.

Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected from copying.