Priti Patel, United Kingdom’s secretary of state for the home department, has come under scrutiny over her comments on the $10 billion arbitration fine case between Nigeria and the Process and Industrial Developments (P&ID).
Following last week’s UK court ruling in favour of Nigeria, Private Eye, a British current affairs news magazine, published an article on the involvement of Patel in the case.
P&ID had sued Nigeria for allegedly breaching the terms of a gas supply and processing agreement contract it reportedly signed in 2010.
In January 2017, a UK tribunal ordered Nigeria to pay P&ID $6.6 billion as damages, as well as pre- and post-judgment interest, all of which amounted to about $10 billion.
Advertisement
But the country initiated legal proceedings to challenge the ruling, alleging that the contract was fraught with corrupt dealings.
In an article criticising Nigeria for taking step to appeal the arbitral award, Patel had said the country must “shape up and honour its obligations” if it wants to take part in global markets.
“In Nigeria, the unhappy experience of the firm founded by two Irishmen, Process and Industrial Development (P&ID) … demonstrates the risk that businesses will face in Nigeria,” she had written in the City A.M.
Advertisement
She had also accused Nigeria of flouting international law and convention, adding: “Investors must consider this long-running scandal and weigh this obstinance against Nigeria’s mishandled economic potential.”
However, in a turn of events last week, a UK court granted Nigeria an extension of time and relief from sanctions in the $10 billion fine after ruling that it is “necessary to consider a considerable amount of the material to decide firstly, whether, as Nigeria contended, there is a prima facie case of fraud and how strong that case is, and secondly, the steps Nigeria took to investigate the alleged fraud from late 2015.”
In a piece seen by TheCable on Wednesday, Private Eye said Patel was “too busy” to explain her relationship with the court case.
“Patel was too busy to explain to the Eye how she became involved in this crucial development issue – but her words sit uneasily now given last week’s commercial court ruling in favour of Nigeria,” it wrote.
Advertisement
“Curious company indeed for any bright politician to keep.”
It quoted Paul Foot, a Bloomberg journalist, as describing the P&ID situation as a “saga of abuse involving dodgy contractors and local politicians, supported by the usual phalanx of international hedge funds, lobbyists and lawyers.”
2 comments
The woman is a paid lobbyist for Atiku and his goons.she was one of those here in UK supporting the looters to come back to power.
So sad that she made those baseless and unscrupulous comments against a country without obtaining details of the transaction. It is unequivocal, that some “developed” countries and their companies take advantage of the bad leadership in Africa to steal and promote fraudulent practices in Africa. P & ID never qualified for such contract/agreement but paid Nigerian officials to corruptly get the agreement signed. Very unfortunate that Priti Patel did not see anything wrong in that. Following the revelation that P & ID actually paid Nigerian officials to obtain the agreement, I hope she will call for investigation of P & ID.