--Advertisement--

Witness: How I received N108m from Badeh

At the resumed trial of Alex Badeh, former defence chief, on Tuesday, Mustapha Yerima, a prosecution witness, gave Okon Abang, a justice of the federal high court, Abuja, a blow-by-blow account of how he was paid the sum of N108m through Badeh’s company, Vetivo Nigeria Limited.

Yerima added that the process of the payment came through a third party.

According to him, “the payment that came through a third party is as a result of the meeting between myself, Air Comodore Yushau (a retired Air Commodore and former director of finance and account) and Badeh. This was prior to my meeting with Air Commodore Yushau and Barrister Timothy Muje.  At the meeting, Yushau introduced Timothy to me as the lawyer to Air Chief Marshall Badeh since he (Yushau) was retiring. He said I should transfer all the necessary documents to the lawyer (Timothy).’’

“Yushau came to the said meeting with prepared Deed of Assignment and Power of Attorney with his company’s name and another document transfering the title from Ryte Builders to Edile Construction Company. He was given a copy to sign and he did. He said he handed over to Timothy, the original Certificate of Occupancy, C of O, and the Deed of Assignment.”

Advertisement

After the trasnfer of the documents, Yerima claimed that he recieved the sum of N108m.

“I recieved an alert from one Vetivo Nigerian  Limited. I called Badeh and he confirmed that Vetivo Nigeria Limited was his and he instructed that the money be paid into my company’s account”, Yerima claimed.

He further narrated how Badeh out of fear changed his mind on the property that he earlier wanted to acquire for the construction of his shopping mall at Aminu Kano Crescent and opted for the one located at the Wuse 2 district of Abuja.

Advertisement

According to Yerima, when the transactions were no longer clear to him, and he was denied access to the power of attorney he had earlier given to Badeh and his men, he became agitated and decided to tell the EFCC all that he knew about Badeh and the property he acquired which costs about N1.8billion, including the land.

“I was confronted with some chilling evidence, so many documents like the copies of drawings, list of quantity survey, statement of accounts and so many other documents related to the account including e-mail correspondences.  At that point, I had nothing to say, but to tell the EFCC exactly the way things happened”, Yerima said.

The witness also narrated how the Nigerian air force conference centre was constructed.

He said: “The Nigeria air force conference centre was constucted in the name of Edile Construction Company. The company operates separate accounts and all paymets for the construction of the conference centre go to the company’s account in UBA, Keystone and StanbicIBTC bank.”

Advertisement

He added that, all payments made to Ryte Builders in respect of the mall were made to Ryte’s Builders account with Zenith bank.

At this point, the prosecution counsel, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN) told the court that he discovered on Monday that the witness made additional statement which he had served on the first and second defence counsel.

But Badeh’s counsel, Akin Olujimi (SAN) said: “For me to be able to cross examine the witness, I will have to digest this additional proof to see how it affects our understanding of the prosecution.”

Counsel to the second defendant, S T Ologunorisa (SAN), also aligned himself with Olujimi’s position.

Advertisement

Consequently, Justice Abang adjourned the case to June 14, 15 and 16, for further hearing.

Badeh, while being the CDS, among other things allegedly abused his office between January and December, 2013.

Advertisement

He was said to have used dollar equivalent of the sum of N1.4bn removed from the accounts of the Nigeria air force to purchase pieces of property in choice areas of Abuja.

According to the EFCC, the offence is in contravention of Section 15 (2) (d) of the money laundering (Prohibition) act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under section 15(3) of the same act.

Advertisement
Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected from copying.